15 August 2006

George Allen is Done

He's finished. Put a skewer in him.

He may get re-elected to the Senate, but his presidential aspirations blew away with this remark yesterday:

"This fellow here, over here with the yellow shirt, macaca, or whatever his name is. He's with my opponent. . . Let's give a welcome to macaca, here. Welcome to America and the real world of Virginia."



the washington post follows up:

"Depending on how it is spelled, the word macaca could mean either a monkey that inhabits the Eastern Hemisphere or a town in South Africa. In some European cultures, macaca is also considered a racial slur against African immigrants, according to several Web sites that track ethnic slurs."

It sounds like the Allen Campaign handled the firestorm with tact:

"But the apology, which came hours after Allen's campaign manager dismissed the issue with an expletive and insisted the senator has "nothing to apologize for," did little to mollify Webb's campaign or Sidarth, who said he suspects Allen singled him out because his was the only nonwhite face among about 100 Republican supporters . . ."Not many people in southwest Virginia would think it is derogatory," Griffith said. "I didn't have a clue what it meant, and I doubt Allen did, either."

Ah, but why would Allen say a word that was meaningless to him? For more on that we go to Tapped:

"Ryan Lizza makes a great point on George Allen’s "Macaque" slur. As of now, it's a weird term that few of us know, and Allen is seeking to capitalize on it by claiming that "I don't know what it means." Why'd he use a word he doesn't know? Because it sounds vaguely like "mohawk," a word that doesn't describe the target's haircut, but sounds enough like "macaque" that the Allen campaign has decided to make it the alibi (left unexplained is why Allen didn't just use the word "mohawk"). Here's the thing, as Lizza notes: Allen is one of the few people who actually would know the term "macaque." It's a French slur for North Africans. Allen's mother is French Tunisian -- yes, a North African -- and Allen speaks French. You stay classy, George."

The aforementioned Ryan Lizza of The New Republic is no stranger to George Allen's race issues.

The Washington Post, probably the most influential newspaper politics-wise, is all over this in an editorial entitled "George Allen's America."

The Washington Post is also all over this:


"They legislate and look good doing it! Sartorial multi-tasking was apparently enough to land Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. Joe Biden on Esquire's list of "The Best Dressed Men in the World 2006."

For the third year, the magazine selected 20 men "who get it exactly right." Obama was cited for his sober but well-tailored suits and "impeccable ties" -- but was outranked on the list by Biden, who was praised for power dressing that "unmistakably says 'authority' ": strong suits, bold ties, pocket squares, cuff links and chunky watches.

"This is unexpected and undeserved," Biden said Friday. "My dad was an elegant dresser, and he used to say, 'Anybody who can buy off the rack can't be that sophisticated.' "





12 Comments:

At 15 August, 2006 14:40, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Allen still might be capable of talking himself out of this one, if someone on his staff takes the fall for saying "macaque" in the first place. He might have just misheard them saying "Mohawk," and forgotten the French slur he allegedly knew.

But it hurts, given his past Confederate flag-waving tendencies. Republicans are trying to mend fences with African-American voters, and could banish him to the sidelines as they did to Trent Lott.

Coming out of '04, the folksy, laid-back Allen seemed like the perfect heir to Bush. (Even his "good-humored" ribbing of Mr. Sidarth is reminiscent of Bush's conduct at press conferences). But now, w/ the Presidential approval rating still in the 30s, it just ain't cute anymore, even to Republicans.

Dems shouldn't concede VA, either. The state seems to be trending purple, and has a substantial African-American population that won't be amused by this incident. Allen's challenger Jim Webb has his troubles among African-Americans as well, having been opposed to affirmative action before he was for it, but this incident could level that playing field.

Webb is not a good campaigner, but he is a credible candidate who stands ready to benefit from an Allen implosion. He was almost 20 points down in the polls last week, but there's a lot of time left on the clock ...

 
At 16 August, 2006 09:57, Blogger Christopher said...

This could be a good race. I don't see how someone from his staff can take the fall for saying it in the first place. The video on youtube has been downloaded 40,000 times, it was on CNN & MSNBC last night, and we can all watch Allen say it.

It's obscure, so it might not be clear to all what's so offensive, but there are plenty of believable explanations (all of them bad) and no believable excuse. Mohawk? This could get drilled into the media's consciousness more than the average voter. But at this point in the '08 positioning - it could be fatal.

Some more commentary from slate:
"For potential presidential candidates, the bar for showing intellectual heft will be higher after George W. Bush than it was before him. Based on the conversations I've had with GOP elites and fund-raisers, the candidate most likely to suffer from this heightened standard is George Allen . . . At least one person who has been wooed by the Allen camp came away from a meeting with the senator with this kiss-off of his chances: 'Too much like Bush.' . . . Unflattering moments become a candidate's signature when they confirm existing stereotypes."

John Dickerson seems see the GOP landscape the way DGL does.

 
At 17 August, 2006 08:30, Blogger Christopher said...

I think I now know what dgl was referring to when he mentioned the staff saying it in the first place.

from the hotline blog:

"According to two Republicans who heard the word used, "macaca" was a mash-up of "Mohawk," referring to Sidarth's distinctive hair, and "caca," Spanish slang for excrement, or "shit."

Said one Republican close to the campaign: "In other words, he was a shit-head, an annoyance." . . .
Kristian Denny Todd, communications director for James Webb, said the new explanation rings hollow. "I don't know what's worse; calling this innocent 20-year-old a "shit head" or a racist slur"

I linked to this piece from James Wolcott's blog where he crown's Allen Senator Shithead. The title of Wolcott's post is TURD ON THE RUN.

 
At 17 August, 2006 10:30, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Subhead from today's Hotline:

"Macaca Es Su Caca"...

 
At 17 August, 2006 12:09, Blogger Unknown said...

Even the president seems to be distancing himself from himself . . . oh sweet alienation. Who knew that Jason Jones could make Heidegger funny?

Was going to link to the Daily Show bits on Allen, but technical difficulties have intervened. . . .

Looking forward to an update on the polls, DGL.

 
At 17 August, 2006 13:12, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nothing on VA yet, but here are some poll results you may NOT like so much:

A Quinnipiac poll has Lieberman beating Lamont 53-41% among likely voters in the general election. Democrats go for Lamont 63% to 35%, but it's Joementum in a landslide among Indies (58 to 36) and even more so among Republicans (75 to 13, w/ only 10% in favor of the actual GOP candidate, Schlesinger).

Also, since we've been talking foreign policy lately: a Zogby poll asks respondents whether, "In a world where the principle (sic) enemies are terrorists, diplomacy is outdated." The party split is stunning: 46% of Republicans "strongly agree" with this statement, while another 33% "somewhat agree." The numbers for Democrats are almost the exact opposite. It doesn't get more stark than that.

I guess I know which party I'm in.

 
At 18 August, 2006 11:58, Anonymous Anonymous said...

More ingenious web satire, this time from Huffington Post ...

 
At 21 August, 2006 14:12, Blogger Christopher said...

from talkingpointsmemo:

VA-SEN: Poll: Allen's Lead Over Webb Shrinks To Three Points
By Greg Sargent | bio

GOP incumbent Senator George Allen's "Macaca" remarks have turned the contest with Dem challenger James Webb into a real race. An exclusive Survey USA poll done for WUSA-TV shows that Allen's once-double-digit lead over Webb has shriveled to three points -- 48% to 45%. From the WUSA analysis: "Allen has lost support across all demographic groups, but in particular, among younger voters, he has gone from Plus 23 to Minus 17, a swing of 40 points. In Southeastern VA, Allen has gone from a 2:1 lead to a tie, a 31-point swing." Don't mess with Macaca!

 
At 22 August, 2006 07:39, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well, there you go.

The mainstream outlets (other than WUSA) haven't picked up on this yet. It'll be interesting to see whether other polls bear this pattern out.

Also, I think some new numbers are coming out today showing Lamont nearly catching up to Lieberman. More later.

 
At 22 August, 2006 15:37, Blogger Unknown said...

Okay fine, I'll do it:
From CNN:
"A new poll by the American Research Group indicated a statistical dead heat in the U.S. Senate race in Connecticut between upstart Democratic nominee Ned Lamont and incumbent Sen. Joseph Lieberman."

So there we go. As I've said before, in no less clichéd a fashioin than now, hope springs eternal.

The story, I know, is premium content, but the Economist has an encouraging piece on the "anti-war centre" in the US.

This passage confirms DGL's mention of the party-line split on issues of, well, war, though it adds an encouraging twist about that supposed 'centre':
"Attitudes still break down sharply along party lines, with Republicans much keener on the war than Democrats. Gradually, though, independent voters have crept into the peacenik camp. An anti-war left has been joined by an anti-war centre."

This comment is too long, but I'll let the Economist close with a refreshing--to my mind--discussion of the supposed effects of those Net-roots folks who keep getting so much, um, press coverage these days:
"Mr Lieberman's camp blames many of his troubles on anti-war blogs such as the Daily Kos, and even accuses left-wing hackers of bringing down his website the day before the election. They exaggerate. It is doubtful that many Connecticut Democrats were swayed by a blog, particularly one as indigestible as the Daily Kos. The site, together with others, such as Moveon.org, raised money for Mr Lamont's campaign, but that mattered little to a candidate who was prepared to spend so much of his own fortune. Tom Swan, Mr Lamont's campaign manager, says the blogs supplied fewer than one dollar out of every ten that was spent on the race."

 
At 22 August, 2006 15:41, Blogger Unknown said...

In fairness I ought to add that the Economist, while reasonable in their analysis of the CT situation and that centre, insists on arguing for a continued US presence (and no timetable) in Iraq. They even stooped to using that childish 'cut and run' phrase, alas.

 
At 23 August, 2006 08:29, Anonymous Anonymous said...

We sure are seeing a lot of poll movement this week. Macaca-gate seems to have some legs, and CT voters just can't make up their minds.

Last week's Quinnipiac poll in CT showed only 2% of voters were undecided, but this new American Research Group poll Yancy cites seems to show a lot of voters moving out of the Lieberman column and into undecided, which is now at 11%, I think.

American Research Group is also showing Bush down at 36% approval while other polls have him on the upswing, at about 42%. I wonder if ARG polls tend to skew leftward, or if they know something no one else knows.

A Rasmussen Group poll has Webb within 5 points of Allen, so the WUSA poll may not be an anomaly.

The Democrats desperately need unexpected pickups like VA if they are to take over the Senate. MT, PA, MO, OH, and RI, all look good right now, but that still wouldn't be enough, esp. since they might lose Democratic seats in WA or NJ. They need to pull an upset in either VA, TN, or AZ, to have a shot.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home